Week 4
Part 1:
The quality of the lesson is good. I am pleasantly surprised at the lesson in general. I think that the lesson that AI generated first is a great outline for a lesson addressing these two standards. I could have asked it to be more specific with certain parts but I enjoyed how vague it was. This would allow me to dive deeper with AI or take it and put my own spin on it.
The improvement I would suggest would be asking it to regenerate the lesson with time stamps, more of a problem based approach, and ask it for some worksheets to go along with the activities.
I think the tool is useful for the rigor I am looking for in my classroom. Specifically with the assessments that it focuses on. This is a great addition to make sure that students are getting some sort of check in before moving on to the next lesson.
This lesson reflects the readings because of it's emphasis on allowing students to create their own data displays, choose their own data they want to look at, and allowing them to have autonomy with the content being taught.
Part 2:
I chose to play around with the Professional Email Tool. It helps you form an email to someone, organize your thoughts and ideas you need to get across, and helps maintain a professional tone. This is extremely useful because reading tone over email can be very misleading, and keeping it professional in a school is very important. Sometimes when you are typing something, you might think it holds a light tone, but to someone else it could come off disrespectful. This would be an interesting tool to help students work on their emails to teachers, especially when it comes time to ask for letters of recommendation!
Part 3:
I think this is a very helpful tool for teachers when they are looking to tie together multiple standards like we did today. It would also be helpful to create ideas of how to teach different lessons. I would share this with my colleagues because a lot of them have complaints about time management, and I think this would help them in many ways.
I see benefits in my lessons with Magic School because I'll be able to generate new lessons with my ideas in a timely fashion. I will find myself with a very cool idea, but no time to actually sit and work out the logistics. This tool will help me greatly in the future.
I am not sure how to bring AI into the classroom with students, my experience only lies with me using it to create materials for lessons. A platform I am consistently on is called CoTeach.ai, this is an AI platform that is linked to my curriculum I use in my Algebra I classroom. It helps me understand the lessons better and create additional support materials that would take me days to create on my own.
You make a great suggestion to add time stamps to the lesson generated by this platform. I like the idea of using AI for help with lesson planning, but it definitely doesn't account for how much time we have to complete the lesson in one class period. So it would be helpful to have some idea of how much time each section might take.
ReplyDeleteI really like how you pointed out that leaving parts of the AI-generated lesson vague can actually be a strength. That flexibility to customize is something I’ve found valuable too—it lets the teacher’s creativity fill in the gaps while still saving time. I also agree that adding time stamps or problem-based elements would increase engagement and flow.
ReplyDeleteYour point about the Professional Email Tool is spot on; tone can completely change how a message is received. I hadn’t considered using that as a way for students to practice digital professionalism, but now I’m thinking it would fit perfectly into a career-readiness or communication unit.
Have you tried using Magic School’s “student tool” versions yet? I’m curious how those might support what you mentioned about bringing AI into the classroom with students.
I was also pleasantly surprised by the lesson. The Professional Email Tool is one that I will have to use, thanks to your suggestion.
ReplyDelete